Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Masur vs Kamil Majchrzak Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Masur vs Majchrzak analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Masur vs Kamil Majchrzak Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Masur 1 - 0 Majchrzak
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Masur has won 51.96% of points on their second serve, while Majchrzak has won 59.57%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Masur, in recent form, has won 51.66% of their opponent's second serve points, while Majchrzak has won 53.62%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.03% and 38.25% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Masur has saved 64.8% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Majchrzak has saved 69.68% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Masur has won 67.14% of matches played (W/L 47/ 23), with Majchrzak winning 82.22% (W/L 37/ 8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Masur has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 134/ 104), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 8/ 11). Majchrzak has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 220/ 115), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 38/ 29).
- Player level: In the last year, Masur has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 74.36% of matches (W/L 29/ 10), where as Majchrzak has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 87.5% of matches (W/L 21/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Masur winning 1 times and Majchrzak being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Masur winning 2 and Majchrzak winning 0. The last match between Masur and Majchrzak was at the Netherlands F2, 24-06-2016, Quarterfinals, Clay with Daniel Masur getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:11:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Masur and Majchrzak have played a deciding set 0 times, with Masur winning 0 times and Majchrzak 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Masur winning 0, and Majchrzak 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Masur has played against opponents with an average rank of 198.31 while Majchrzak has played against players with an average rank of 205.56.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Masur has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Majchrzak has won 78% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Masur has converted 44.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Majchrzak has converted 46.47% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
295
Rank
176
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
290
Rank
75
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
58% (384-279)
Career Total W/L
64% (370-210)
78% (32-9)
YTD W/L
82% (37-8)
$151,200
Career Prize Money
$867,345
3
YTD Titles
4
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Masur | Kamil Majchrzak |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:11:0 | 1:11:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (40/60) | 60% (28/47) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (30/40) | 68% (19/28) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 60% (12/20) | 47% (9/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/5) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (19/47) | 30% (18/60) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Daniel Masur
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Masur | Kamil Majchrzak |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 78% (32/9) | 82% (37/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 74% (70/25) | 78% (76/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (538/401) | 64% (548/308) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 80% (16/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 86% (19/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 85% (28/5) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.48 | 0.41 |
| Aces Total | 222 | 170 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.09 |
| DFs Total | 106 | 37 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:19 | 1:23:20 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 178 | 205.56 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1858/2853) | 62% (1502/2432) |
| 1st Serve W% | 76% (1406/1858) | 76% (1137/1502) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (518/995) | 60% (554/930) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (131/296) | 46% (145/312) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (1180/2978) | 44% (1135/2579) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 82% (9/2) | 75% (15/5) |
| Futures W/L | 79% (23/6) | 88% (21/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 78% (32/41) | 84% (37/44) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (12/18) | 43% (3/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 54% (7/13) | 78% (7/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (34/30) | 97% (37/36) |
| 1st set W, L | 12% (34/4) | 0% (37/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 13% (8/1) |
Daniel Masur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Timofey Skatov
Player
Daniel Masur
49%
(
41 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Lucas Gerch
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Vilius Gaubas
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Michael Geerts
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
99)
10
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
85
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Daniel Masur
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ewen Lumsden
Player
Daniel Masur
67%
(
60 of
89)
1st Serve %
76%
(
84 of
111)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
55 of
84)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
111)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Daniel Cox
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Daniel Masur
68%
(
65 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Daniel Masur
60%
(
64 of
106)
1st Serve %
63%
(
70 of
111)
8
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
2
78%
(
50 of
64)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
54 of
70)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
34 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
111)
111
Total Points Won
106
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Theo Papamalamis
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Kamil Majchrzak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Joel Schwaerzler
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Ryan Seggerman
59%
(
60 of
101)
1st Serve %
59%
(
58 of
99)
6
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
63%
(
26 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
30 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
99)
108
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(2) 6-7(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Alexander Weis
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
90%
(
37 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
16 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Jonas Forejtek
55%
(
42 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
21 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
72)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Gauthier Onclin
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jie Cui
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
38 of
45)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amr Elsayed
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
0
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Marek Gengel
71%
(
80 of
113)
1st Serve %
70%
(
78 of
111)
9
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
55 of
78)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
38 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
111)
113
Total Points Won
111
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Karim-Mohamed Maamoun
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
80%
(
47 of
59)
5
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
22%
(
10 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Masur Vs Majchrzak Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
